Skip to content

Let's huddle up and share who we are as readers. What is your career role?

Huddle will only approve your comment if you provide your first and last name.

4 Comments

  1. Michael Oldfield
    April 14, 2023 @ 9:34 am

    This article is inaccurate.

    The lack of transparency in the process is what had people upset.

    The meeting did not have to be shut down at all. People just wanted to learn what was being proposed and there was no presentation at all.

    The councillor could have shown a little leadership and welcomed the attendees and made a comment or two before the residents frustrated by the process got upset.

    What a lost opportunity by the city to engage and inspire the citizens of the area.

    How condescending and rude to refer to a passionate and engaged resident as an old lady with a megaphone.

    If this is such an important project then why is it being done in secrecy?

    Reply

    • Housing Necesity
      April 15, 2023 @ 10:33 pm

      Secrecy? It was an information meeting!

      I don’t doubt that the NIMBYs were disruptive given that there was an email circulated in advance designed to shock and appall local homeowners. It helpfully included a template to share on social media to get more people riled up about it.

      The irony of this sweeping protest (and if someone brings their own personal megaphone, there’s no calling it anything else) is that the majority of the NOT IN MY BACKYARD voices will have aged out of this mortal coil before this would even affect them.

      Taking a moment to channel the Amazing Kreskin…he says the protesters were all white!

      Reply

  2. Candice Portnoy
    April 15, 2023 @ 11:01 am

    All these folks who complain about the “lack of transparency” are full of it. All the development application documents are updated when received and posted to the website; planning staff’s detailed reports will be posted in anticipation of any meetings discussing this proposal; there’s a staff email for a lead planner, a clerks email, and councillor email addresses who can receive feedback; there are engagement sessions like this one and later if it proceeds, public hearings.

    A small but vocal set of local residents are upset with the process because it’s a process which will most likely lead to the very reasonable conclusion that this project should proceed, and a consequence will be a change in ‘neighborhood character’ which for a small minority of residents will be perceived as the end of the world.

    Reply

  3. Amy Curry
    April 15, 2023 @ 1:09 pm

    The local residents’ concerns are definitely not “unfounded” as the councillor suggests. The lack of a plan for schools, green space, groceries, utilities, etc to accommodate the influx of a population the size of Truro within the space of one city block are all very valid concerns. I was at the meeting and most people I spoke with were not upset about change in general, nor the prospect of a development, as the councillor suggests… they were upset that the forum didn’t provide opportunity to discuss these issues in any meaningful way.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *