Skip to content

Let's huddle up and share who we are as readers. What is your career role?

Huddle will only approve your comment if you provide your first and last name.

4 Comments

  1. Stephen D
    March 2, 2023 @ 10:27 am

    This gave voice to several wealth blessed business persons who care not about a anything but acquiring more wealth. Only one voice that represents the rest of us.
    Over 3000 units in HRM were short term rentals that would normally be leases and relieve the strain on housing demands. These owners don’t care about the harm they inflict on communities. Most of them don’t even live in the communities or even the very province they are harming.
    HRM should be about the people that live here, not placing tourists who don’t even vote here.
    The property owners who profit off the suffering of the those who cannot find a place to reasonably rent, I play the tiniest fiddle for your situation.

    Reply

  2. HG
    March 2, 2023 @ 12:27 pm

    People that directly benefit and make themselves wealthy by taking home availability away from folks should be listed as such – not this clickbait crap that makes them seem like random folks with unbiased opinions 😐

    Reply

  3. D Skinner
    March 3, 2023 @ 6:25 am

    I have read the comments about vistors or tourist taking long term apartments and housing away from residents who live in Halifax or Dartmouth . These city are tourist attractions. Dont advertise come visit us and not allow short term rentals . Renting a home for a few weeks made my vacation in Florida very enjoyable . Government telling home owners who can stay in there homes is not the way to go

    Reply

  4. ES
    March 7, 2023 @ 11:46 am

    What do people think we did before airbnbs? There are hotels, there are previously existing short term rental spots. You can be a tourist attracting city with less airbnbs, this change doesn’t mean less tourists, it means they will have to pay a reasonable price given there is a housing crisis in the city they are visiting.

    I agree this article highlights the laughable take from investors and not enough from the community at large. I for one and so happy to know council largely agrees with residents and is on our side to make change happen.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *